Clinical conversation capture
The workflow can capture and transcribe in-person visits or visits conducted through telemedicine. In initial demonstrations, use synthetic content; real data requires the governance safeguards described on this page.
Use a demonstration with a synthetic script to observe how Zello Life captures the conversation, organizes an editable draft, and keeps the final decision with the physician responsible for the patient’s care.
Useful features reduce repetitive work while professionals retain control of the final record.
The workflow can capture and transcribe in-person visits or visits conducted through telemedicine. In initial demonstrations, use synthetic content; real data requires the governance safeguards described on this page.
AI organizes the context into drafts of clinical documents that can be reviewed and corrected before the decision to incorporate them into the medical record.
The workflow includes specialty-specific clinical templates for structuring the draft. The template does not automatically confirm names, doses, or clinical decisions.
The workflow keeps the content as an editable draft so the professional can check, correct, and approve the final version before saving, exporting, or sharing it.
Every step provides clear evidence for a physician or manager to verify before moving ahead.
In a demonstration or initial pilot, use cases without patient data that include similar names, numbers, units, frequencies, and negations.
Before using real data, document the applicable legal basis, transparency to the patient, purpose, retention periods, access profiles, disposal, and the responsibilities of those involved in data processing. This is a minimum operational boundary, subject to legal and regulatory assessment of the case.
Use the synthetic script to capture the conversation and have AI organize the context in the selected clinical template.
The physician responsible for the patient’s care compares the draft with the synthetic conversation and identifies omissions, substitutions, incorrect attributions, and excerpts that need correction.
The final version should be saved, exported, shared, or incorporated into the medical record only after review, corrections, and validation by the responsible clinician. Administrative management may monitor the process but may not replace that decision.
Use these answers as a starting point and validate the workflow against your operation's rules, contracts, and needs.
No. The product organizes the context into an editable draft. Confirming names, values, units, and meaning depends on review by the physician responsible for the patient’s care.
The workflow can capture and transcribe conversations in both settings. This alone does not authorize the use of real data: the organization must first establish governance conditions and the applicable LGPD analysis.
Yes. The draft is editable and must be corrected before it is saved, exported, shared, or incorporated into the medical record.
The physician responsible for the patient’s care reviews the content and decides whether it will be incorporated into the medical record. Administrative organization of the pilot does not replace that final medical decision.
No. Before any use involving real data, the organization must assess and document the legal basis, transparency, purpose, retention, access, disposal, and responsibilities, in addition to other requirements applicable to the case.
Use entirely synthetic spoken content with similar names, units, decimals, frequencies, and negations. Compare each draft with the script and document the corrections needed under each axis of the matrix.
Configure a template, validate capture, and check every passage before expanding use to the team.